
The global trade environment is experiencing structural changes fuelled by geopolitical competition, technological advances, along with evolving trade norms. Emerging economies such as Indonesia are adapting their external economic strategies to ensure that they have increased access to markets such as the European Union (EU), which continue to serve as one of the largest trading blocs in the world. Although the EU has huge economic potentials, it equally subjects countries, which aim at developing rapidly with resource base to regulation challenges.
Indonesia ranks the EU as its fifth-largest trading partner and also its third-largest source of foreign direct investment. Nevertheless, the relationship is not friction free. Indonesia’s export structure that is commodity-dependent, especially those concerning palm oil and nickel has also caused several conflicts between the EU and Indonesia regarding sustainability standards and resource management.
In an attempt to overcome such obstacles, Indonesia is developing a growing interest in bilateral diplomacy with European Union member states that might prove more receptive to its developmental ambitions. Hungary appears to be a very important partner. Since adopting its Eastern Opening Policy (Keleti Nyitás) in 2010, Hungary has sought to enhance interaction with Asian economies, among them the Indonesian economy. With little domestic political hostilities to Indonesian exports and a practical attitude towards trade policy, Hungary could be an efficient interlocutor in Indonesia economic diplomacy.
Indonesia and Hungary established formal diplomatic relations in 1955, at a time when global alliances were defined by the Cold War rivalries as well as the emergence of the Non-Aligned Movement. The relationship started with a focus on cultural diplomacy but later grew into education, politics and trade. Hungary awarded Indonesians academic scholarships and also promoted cultural and arts exchange.
Hungary’s accession to the EU in 2004 was the decisive point. High-level visits as well as economic forums revitalized bilateral ties. The establishment of the Indonesia–Hungary Joint Commission on Bilateral Economic Cooperation marked a great transformation toward more pragmatic engagement.
The Indonesian Ministry of Trade states that the volume of bilateral trade rose by 13.35% in 2020 when compared to the previous year despite pandemic-related disruptions. Indonesia mainly exports palm oil, footwear, rubber, and furniture to Hungary, whereas Hungary supplies it with pharmaceuticals, precision instruments, and electrical machinery. This trade is of a modest volume nevertheless, but it represents sectoral complementarities between the two nations.
Hungary’s strategic location in the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region, especially in the Visegrád Group (V4) adds value to Indonesia. The influence of the V4 in the decision-making process of the EU is increasing, particularly in high-tech and production industries. Hungary can therefore be a gateway to Indonesian firms wanting entry into regional supply chains in Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Cultural and educational engagement has also played a very important role as well. Through the Stipendium Hungaricum scholarship program, students from Indonesia can access fully funded educational opportunities in Hungary, helping to build a new generation of bilateral ambassadors. Cultural initiatives that include batik, culinary festivals, interfaith dialogues, and others also helped to enhance soft power ties and mutual understanding among the two nations.
Indonesia’s relationship with the broader EU is increasingly defined by trade tensions that are based on differences in environmental and industrial policies, and two disputes stand out:
The first one is palm oil. The EU Renewable Energy Directive II (RED II), considers palm-oil based biofuels to be environmentally unsustainable as a result of indirect land-use change (ILUC) risks. It requires a phase out by 2030. As the World's largest producer of palm oil, Indonesia considers this policy as a discriminatory green protectionism. In response, Indonesia filed a complaint in the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2019 (WT/DS593).
The second issue concerns nickel. In 2020, Indonesia put a ban on raw nickel exports to encourage local value-added processing of its electric vehicle (EV) batteries industry. This was challenged by the EU at the WTO and their decision was against Indonesia in 2022 (WT/DS592). The case is still unresolved due to the WTO Appellate Body’s paralysis.
These disputes highlight the structural tensions that exist between the EU’s normative approach to trade and Indonesia’s development-driven industrial policy. Rather than confronting the EU as a bloc, Indonesia has turned to a more subtle tactic of seeking out individual member states like Hungary that are more flexible in policy interpretation and less bound to issues of regulatory orthodoxy.
Hungary is highly situated to act in this regard. It does not have any remarkable interest in competing commodities such as palm oil or nickel and is inclined to adopt a pragmatic view of trade relations. Under Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Hungary has actively pursued sovereignty in the EU policymaking process and often disagreed with Brussels on regulatory issues including those on environmental benchmarks.
Hungary’s openness can be traced to its Eastern Opening Policy which explicitly aims to diversify Hungary's external partnerships beyond Western Europe. This is in line with the maritime connectivity agenda of Indonesia and ASEAN-centric approach to diplomacy. Hungary’s positioning within EU institutions, especially the Council of the EU, where national governments shape collective trade decisions, also offers Indonesia a very valuable point of influence.
By enhancing its relationship with Hungary, Indonesia can not only open bilateral trade and investment hopes, but also have an ally in EU trade talks. Hungary’s relatively neutral position on palm oil and nickel makes it a very good potential intermediary in contentious policy areas. It can play a key role in guiding Indonesia through the internal EU issues, coalition formation, and efforts to promote more balanced regulatory outcomes.
The geographic position of Hungary in Central and Eastern Europe and its evolving foreign policy has increased its stature in the EU-Asia relations. Following the financial crisis of 2008 and European stability in the eurozone, in 2010 Hungary started the Eastern Opening Policy (Keleti Nyitás) to diversify its economic relationships with Asia. Since that time, Hungary has enhanced cooperation with China, South Korea, Japan, Vietnam and Indonesia in trade, culture and institutional partnerships.
Hungary is the first EU member to join the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative and has attracted a lot of significant Asian investment, especially in green technology and digital sectors. The East-facing approach is in line with Indonesia’s effort to build pragmatic, development-oriented partnerships within the EU.
In addition, Hungary frequently promotes itself as a “policy entrepreneur” in the EU, opposing the mainstream regulatory trends on issues like environmental policy and trade. The scepticism it has shown to elements of the EU Green Deal, shows a similar trajectory to those expressed by Indonesia over sustainability-related trade restrictions like This shared preference for economic pragmatism over normative policy allows Hungary to act both as a bilateral ally as well as a very important and diplomatic mediator to assist Indonesia in brokering its way through EU trade politics. As the EU–ASEAN relationship grows, Hungary offers Indonesia a great platform to promote more balanced and inclusive trade arrangements within the EU.
Palm oil is an important Indonesian commodity facing EU-based crackdowns due to the RED II directive listing it as a high risk commodity. Hungary produces sunflower oil, but takes a more pragmatic approach when it comes to the issue, importing palm oil for industrial use and remaining open to sustainable cooperation as well.
A mutual certification structure might be established to harmonise the openness of Hungary with the ISPO standards of Indonesia. Possible cooperation in this regard includes:
This model would mitigate EU-wide trade barriers while supporting both countries' agricultural sectors.
The ban on Indonesian nickel exports promotes its production of EV batteries domestically- this acts in accordance with the Green Deal promoted by the EU. Hungary, an emerging EV manufacturing hub on the other hand offers complementary potential. Cooperation could include:
This collaboration will boost industrial upgrading and assist Indonesia in securing access to EU high value markets.
The Multi Lane Free Flow (MLFF) toll system, developed by Hungary’s Roatex Ltd., in Indonesia, demonstrates the rationale of bilateral infrastructure cooperation in assisting modernization objectives of Indonesia. The project incorporates GPS based cashless tolling, and it is supported by a $300-million investment.
Challenges such as regulatory alignment and public outreach still exist, but the project demonstrates what Hungary can contribute to digital transformation as well as smart mobility, setting a very good precedent for further cooperation in the fields of digital governance and infrastructure.
Indonesian-Hungarian socio-cultural relations have expanded especially through the Stipendium Hungaricum scholarship program, where Indonesia holds the largest quota in Southeast Asia. To maximize impact:
Programs such as Indonesian International Student Mobility Awards, (IISMA) and Darmasiswa facilitate cultural exchange and it is common to find alumni acting as informal cultural ambassadors. There are a lot of untapped potentials in vocational internships, especially for Indonesian polytechnic students in Hungarian industries such as manufacturing, IT, and hospitality.
Public-private partnerships would be able to expand internship opportunities and improve bilateral industrial cooperation.
Therefore expanding educational exchange, scholarships, as well as vocational opportunities will build a resilient people-to-people foundation that strengthens long-term bilateral ties.
Although Indonesia and Hungary are diverse in terms of their size and geography, they have three main strategic characteristics that provide a solid foundation of collaboration.
The availability of EU innovation funds in Hungary and the youthful and tech-savvy labor market of Indonesia has the potential to generate quite significant public-private cooperation.
These shared goals and challenges provide a strong basis for Indonesia and Hungary to act as forward looking middle powers that work together to establish novel ways of cooperation that are founded in the principles of sovereignty, sustainability, and inclusive prosperity.
To unlock the potential of Hungary-Indonesia relations, the following policy actions are recommended:
1. Establish a Joint Trade and Investment Council
Indonesia and Hungary should establish a high-level council composed of government officials, chambers of commerce and other stakeholders in the private sector.
2. Enhance Sector-Specific Collaboration
The two countries must initiate pilot activities that are in line with the EU green transition and the development agenda of Indonesia..
3. Leverage EU Structural Funds and Programs
Hungary can act as the gateway to EU funding programs in Indonesia, especially areas such as digital and green areas..
Hungary can advocate for the inclusion of Indonesian commodities (e.g. palm oil and nickel) in the EU’s sustainable value chains, ensuring that they conform to EU's stringent environmental and labor standards.
4. Advance CEPA Negotiations with Hungarian Support
Hungary could become a constructive broker during the Indonesia–EU Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) negotiations.
As a less protectionist EU member, Hungary can mediate between more conservative EU states and Indonesia to ensure an agreement that is based on equity and also reciprocity.
5. Promote Cultural and Educational Exchange
People-to-people diplomacy is a long-term investment in bilateral trust.
Hungary offers Indonesia as a strategic but underestimated gateway to further involvement with the EU. Its very pragmatic, growth-oriented foreign policy, coupled with openness toward Asia, positions Hungary as a great ideal partner for Indonesia in finding ways through the EU’s complex trade landscape and accessing Central and Eastern European supply chains.
In an era of increasing protectionism, disruptive digitalization, as well as evolving alliances, middle powers such as Indonesia and Hungary should form new alliances that are strongly based on shared interests, from fair trade to sustainable development. Their cooperation can provide a very good example on how two regionally influential states can collaborate to shape a more inclusive globalization framework..
To move beyond just symbolic engagement, the two countries should invest in effective mechanisms towards mutual development that could overcome trade barriers, create jointly sustainable technologies, increase exchange of academic and professional resources, and also align regulatory standards. Durable institutional linkages such as trade councils and innovation hubs will help in making this ideal partnership future-proof.
In addition to the bilateral outcomes, a positive Indonesia-Hungary hub would contribute to enhancing EU-ASEAN links, especially in the areas of vital importance such as infrastructure, green energy, and electronic governance. Aligning Hungary’s EU influence and also Indonesia’s developmental vision can help in ensuring a much more balanced and representative regional structure.
In conclusion, the shared commitment of Hungary and Indonesia to economic pragmatism, sustainability, as well as multilateralism creates a very good fertile ground for deeper, innovative cooperation. As strategic partners, the close ties between Indonesia and Hungary will help to strengthen not only the relationship between the two of them, but will also help to contribute to building a more equitable and collaborative global economic order.
Note: The cover image accompanying this article was generated using artificial intelligence and is intended for illustrative purposes only
This article examines Indonesia’s recent acquisition of the Turkish-made KHAN...
This article explores how U.S. tariffs, intended to strengthen leverage...
This article explores how the OIC, despite its authority to...
This article examines how the 2025 recognition of Palestine by...
This article shows how the United States’ 19% tariff on...
This article reflects on the Thailand–Cambodia border dispute, capturing it...
This article examines how the absence of coordinated trade negotiations...
This article explores the strategic implications of the Indonesia–Turkey defence...
This article reveals how Hungary, a country that is frequently...
This article examines how a leaked phone conversation between the...
This article examines the 2025 border crisis between Thailand and...
This article explores the deep-rooted and multifaceted rivalry between Israel...
This article critically examines the U.S.–Israel strike on Iran’s nuclear...
This article examines how China is navigating its strategic partnerships...
This article explores how the Red Sea crisis, escalated by...
This article takes a critical look at how Prime Minister...
This article looks at how Malaysia under Anwar Ibrahim is...
This article exposes how over one million Rohingyas stripped of...
This article examines how President Trump’s recent Middle East tour...
This article challenges Indonesia’s and much of the Global South...
This article explores how global trade policies affect women’s labor,...
This article reevaluates the outcome of the Syrian conflict, arguing...
As the shift to clean energy intensifies, resource-rich nations in...
This article examines the 2025 Pahalgam massacre of 26 pilgrims...
Leave A Comment